Kenneth J. Allen & Associates - Injury Attorneys

Illinois and Indiana Personal Injury Lawyers and Attorneys Trial and Civil Litigation Law Firm.

Passion. Commitment. Excellence.

Those three words best describe the driving forces behind Kenneth J. Allen & Associates. Our firm is devoted exclusively to the practice of Accident and Injury Law, and exclusively to the people - not corporations - seriously hurt or killed in incidents as varied as on-the-job accidents, semi-truck crashes, injuries from a defective product, or loss of life because of a doctor's medical malpractice.

As the only multi-state law firm in Valparaiso Indiana, Merrillville Indiana, Indianapolis Indiana, Northwest Indiana, Chicagoland, Joliet Illinois, Tinley Park Illinois, Chicago Illinois accepting serious injury and wrongful death cases, exclusively, Kenneth J. Allen & Associates is experienced and knowledgeable in the details and procedures that can make or break a case.

phone (219)465-6292 fax (219)477-5181
1109 Glendale Boulevard Valparaiso, IN 46383

Monday-Friday: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

Saturday-Sunday: closed

Contact_button_single
Website_button_single
Map_button_single

$5.2 Million Dollar Jury Verdict Upheld

posted by kjalaw on Dec 17th, 2010 at 8:03 pm

 

Court upholds negligence ruling

December 16, 2010

Canadian trucking company Hummer Transportation Inc. does owe a Crown Point couple $5.2 million judgment for negligent equipment and driving on part of its driver, says the Indiana 2nd District Appellate Court.

A ruling issued Wednesday upheld the judgment issued by Porter County Judge William Alexa last year and states the Brampton, Ontario, trucking firm failed to demonstrate how part of Kimberly and Jesse Harty's attorney Kenneth J, Allen's argument improperly influenced the jury in that trial.

Allen, of Valparaiso, said the woman, now 34, and her husband suffered grievous injury and deserve the money they got.

"This establishes the judgment needs to be paid," Allen said Wednesday. "These heavy trucks drive through Northwest Indiana with shoddy equipment and negligent drivers, and it's a hazard to the community."

In 2006, Kimberly Harty, 30, was struck by a semi-truck driven by 37-year-old Inderjeet Sekhon, which veered into her lane and crushed her vehicle under the trailer. The semi was owned by Hummer Transportation of Ontario, Canada.

Harty did not work for more than a year and racked up $123,000 in medical bills at the time of the November 2009 trial.

During that trial, Alexa awarded Kim Harty $4.27 million and her husband $950,000.

"We would gladly give any amount of money just to have our lives back. This is not something I would wish on my worst enemy," Kimberly Harty was quoted as saying a year ago.

 

.

Kenneth J. Allen & Associates Supports New Indiana Rule On Prohibited Lawyer Contact

posted by kjalaw on Nov 24th, 2010 at 8:51 am

Recently, Ken Allen was asked his opinion regarding the new ethics rule promulgated by the Indiana Supreme Court, which bans any contact between attorneys and accident victims for 30 days following the tragic incident. Ken Allen – and everyone at Kenneth J. Allen & Associates – is all for it. (Read the Indiana Supreme Court Order here.)

Post-Trib Interview of Ken Allen on New Ethics Rule

The Post-Tribune sought out Ken Allen’s opinion as a Indiana lawyer with a national reputation for representing injury victims and their families. What was the master trial attorney’s position on the new rule?

Kenneth J. Allen explained that he thinks it is a good idea to have a contact ban because lawyers should not be involved with victims and their loved ones, who are dealing with so many issues and emotions right after a serious accident has occurred.

“I don’t think the people who have just lost a loved one or been in a catastrophic crash need a lawyer contacting them,” Allen told the Post-Tribune. They are dealing with a traumatic event and the ban respects this.

Other Issues Remain Unresolved

However, this new ethics rule may not go far enough. Ken Allen also explained in his interview that it is his opinion that Indiana lawyers should be able to advertise more — using as examples that Kenneth J. Allen & Associates currently is not allowed to report Ken Allen’s success rate in billboards or on the web.

Having that information available to injury victims and their families might mean the difference between choosing a lawyer with skill and experience, versus an attorney with a bad track record — and the results in award amounts to those wronged and seeking justice can be directly correlated to the plaintiff’s legal representative.

Why? Defendants (and their insurance companies) are known to be ready to settle for more money when they know that the alternative is a jury trial with an experienced advocate who’s comfortable in the courtroom.

Sophisticated defense attorneys are all too aware of lawyers that are afraid of the courtroom or those who have the courage to try a case, but don’t have a stellar success record. They are also aware of trial attorneys who go to trial, and win. Guess who can negotiate the bigger settlement with the defense team – or achieve the bigger verdict?

Choosing the attorney to represent an injury victim may have a direct impact on the justice that results for that victim and his loved ones. While the new rule does advance the ball in this regard, more can — and should — be done.

 

.
send to mobile
share bizblog
bookmark

blog history

May

feeds